https://bit.ly/34LRujg
https://bit.ly/3rGV8Uu
https://bit.ly/3Bcf30Q
https://bit.ly/3Bj1qgu
https://bit.ly/368MKF5
https://bit.ly/3JldNvb
https://bit.ly/3LuGgkb
https://bit.ly/3oHtlBx
https://bit.ly/36bRcTH
https://bit.ly/3LvpaCv
https://bit.ly/3uFlSqj
https://bit.ly/3syua0L

So, from my perspective your nature is submissive, but you require your own kink to get you there. Not my cup of tea, I prefer girls who require less ongoing maintenace, but then again that is hardly the issue.

Have a good day.

Be seeing you,

Mackenzie [Road Warrior]/Taken In Hand

www.mackenziecross.ca

by mackenzie on 2004 Dec 22 - 13:20 | reply to this comment
Right
You're right, Dee. If they're dangerous they must exist. But what I meant to say, and missed the mark, was, men like that do exist but they are not suitable mates. The wonderful, stars in the eyes kind of guy who also does that, he's the one I don't feel exists.

I'm not going to do your homework for you. There are BDSM checklists out there on the net and there are plenty of things a man could do with you that might well ring your chimes. Go and study.

"Pat"

by a Taken In Hand reader on 2004 Dec 22 - 20:02 | reply to this comment
Right
No more "homework" is needed on my part, Pat. You are once again assuming to know more about me than you do. I've read up on BDSM for about ten years, belong to a few discussion lists, have met plenty of people in the "scene." It just does not appeal to me much, that's all.

I'm not interested in all the "playing" and the "protocol" and the ritualized behavior and the posturing I see going on. And washing a man's socks is far more interesting to me than ball gags and nipple clamps. That's not to say that there are no BDSM-type activities that I enjoy, but I don't particularly think of them as BDSM. I've seen various "checklists" and probably 90% of the activities listed have either zero or negative appeal for me.